This is a fine concept which uses the theory of relativity and the contrast of physics and art to explore human experience, but is in danger of becoming a conceit which overpowers the show as an entertainment. Each song is finely crafted with a rich mix of humour and emotion, but the cumulative build lessens the overall effect. We needed more light and shade, more time to savour each character’s experience before the next one stepped up with “Now, this is my story…”
At times it felt like Glee on a sugar-high, yet the Manicure monologue is delicately written and impeccably delivered by Jodie Steele, and shows how the show could develop. The spoken scenes were well crafted and provided a welcome contrast and relief. Possibly more speech would allow the songs to shine in their own right.
The performers are equal in demanding and deserving our attention. Simon Bailey revels in Pi, returning to and referencing it with great comedy even when he doesn’t sing the next instalment. He needs to be careful not to over-emote!
Andrew Gallo displays his powerful voice to great effect, balanced by some soft, delicate acting.
Joshua LeClair has two lovely songs “Footprint” and “Apples and Oranges” which he delivers with sensitivity, wit and charm.
Curtis Brown starts weaving the story with a touching and quirky rendition of “Allergic to cats”.
Natasha Karp shows great comedy in her songs and in “Cake”. She enjoys the pairing with Ina Marie Smith and they deliver “The End of the Line” with finesse.
Rebekah Lowings shows vocal skill and her acting range in “Julie’s Song”.
The staging and movement are deft, with great variety achieved with all actors on stage throughout but with little set. The show progressed seamlessly, creating a wide variety of effective pictures. Not quite a musical, more like a high class showcase, each performer has his/her standout section, but there were times when I thought “please don’t sing at me again”! A few more narrative breaks could make this an even more enjoyable show.
Derek Benfield
